WebSeitz/wikilog
z2002-03-26-b
Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

(backlinks off) (map off)
(search off)
last edited by BillSeitz on Jun 30, 2008 2:14 pm

(of the project) on Interoperability Between Collaborative Knowledge Applications: Towards a Standard Graph-Based Data Model for the Open Hyperdocument System . , -based systems, , etc. But no mention of , which isn't surprising, since blogs aren't used this way much yet.

This paper was triggered by a thread about inserting into messages to make them . *I don’t see a way to make real progress at collaboration until we can manage some sort of addressable content in email, which is our primary means of transferring collaborative materials. I'm not sure this is necessary, since most emails are short enough that more granular addressing for discussion isn't really that necessary. Tracing a discussion at a conceptual level across a long thread would be much more interesting (like ), but would probably require a level of user formalism that's not realistic. I think it might make more sense just to have any email archive so that there's message-level addressability in the future (e.g. referring back to an old thread). But I'm not even sure that's* necessary, since in my experience everyone keeps very old email archives of their own (and with cheap disk space it's hard to argue about).

Then Eugene made the case that The final conclusion is that a is a perfect candidate application. It has collaborative editing () and back-links. But this same message made the point about graphs, and people jumped on that bandwagon instead.

See : |


 




Bill Seitz, fluxent at gmail dot com, Weblog