WebSeitz/wikilog
z2002-12-27- Gladwell Group Innovation
It may look like a crisis, but it's only the end of an illusion.

(backlinks off) (map off)
(search off)
last edited by BillSeitz on Sep 18, 2008 3:57 am

on [Saturday Night Live], German philosophy, the , and other examples of the "social dimension of ". When they were not meeting, they were writing to each other with words of encouragement or advice or excitement. This was truly-in a phrase that is invariably and unthinkingly used in the pejorative-a mutual-admiration society... One person's passion-be it carriages, steam, minerals, chemistry, clocks-fired all the others. There was no neat separation of subjects... What were they doing? Darwin, in a lovely phrase, called it "philosophical laughing," which was his way of saying that those who depart from cultural or intellectual consensus need people to walk beside them and laugh with them to give them confidence... [Jenny Uglow]'s book reveals how simplistic our view of groups really is. We divide them into cults and clubs, and dismiss the former for their insularity and the latter for their banality. The cult is the place where, cut off from your peers, you become crazy. The club is the place where, surrounded by your peers, you become boring. Yet if you can combine the best of those two states-the right kind of insularity with the right kind of homogeneity-you create an environment (the ?) both safe enough and stimulating enough to make great thoughts possible. Is this a or ?


 




Bill Seitz, fluxent at gmail dot com, Weblog