WebSeitz/wikilog
z2003-09-15- Matt Web Glancing
Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

(backlinks off) (map off)
(search off)
last edited by BillSeitz on Aug 11, 2008 11:55 pm

has built a tiny app called Glancing which is a different sort of app for a . A group is intended to be less than a dozen people. A person may belong to several groups simultaneously by running separate instances of Glancing... It lets you "glance" at them in idle moments, and it gives all of you an indication of the activity of glancing going on... To model a group of people online who occassionally glance at each other, which is a small social transaction. This is done using a group model which stores the glance state: High if people have been glancing recently, low otherwise. It uses 's network (why not ?). It jiggles a group state, which seems to me to limits its applicability to anything (other than jumping into an all-members ). A slightly different spin which seems more useful to me is jiggling each individual's state, as a measure of his willingness to be interrupted. Just idleness might be one way (except that you "look" idle when you're on the phone or talking to someone f2f). I suppose if one were using a as a front end to all your activity, then you could associate different buckets with availability (if I'm reading A-list then don't bother me, if I'm reading outside blogs go ahead).

Feb2004 update: slides from his session. Incidentally, I think this model of coupling a system which is good for presence and small groups, that's , with a request-response model could be extended quite well. The group is essentially embodied in the buddy the server runs, and it's persistent. It has an existence even when individual members are going on and offline. It might be fun to build more stuff that shares this infrastructure - I'm thinking desktop equivalents to bots. The same ideas as Infobot, but dealing more with problems like consensus generation software.

See : |


 




Bill Seitz, fluxent at gmail dot com, Weblog