WebSeitz/wikilog
z2003-12-18- Crichton Contra Environmentalism
is a Product Manager/CTO with a track-record of bringing a business perspective to building agile product-development teams for start-ups, and is seeking a senior role in an entrepreneurial organization building disruptive Internet-driven products.

(backlinks off) (map off)
(search off)
last edited by BillSeitz on Nov 22, 2008 3:31 am

against . I have been asked to talk about what I consider the most important challenge facing mankind, and I have a fundamental answer. The greatest challenge facing mankind is the challenge of distinguishing reality from fantasy, truth from propaganda. Perceiving the truth has always been a challenge to mankind, but in the [Information Age] (or as I think of it, the disinformation age) it takes on a special urgency and importance... As an example of this challenge, I want to talk today about environmentalism... I think our past record of environmental action is discouraging, to put it mildly, because even our best intended efforts often go awry. But I think we do not recognize our past failures, and face them squarely. And I think I know why. I studied anthropology in college, and one of the things I learned was that certain human [Social Structure]-s () always reappear. They can't be eliminated from society. One of those structures is ... : 60 million Americans will die of starvation in the 1980s... With so many past failures, you might think that environmental predictions would become more cautious. But not if it's a religion... Banning is one of the most disgraceful episodes in the twentieth century history of America... I can tell you that second hand smoke is not a health hazard to anyone and never was, and the has always known it. I can tell you that the evidence for is far weaker than its proponents would ever admit. I can tell you the percentage the land area that is taken by , including cities and roads, is 5%. I can tell you that the Sahara desert is shrinking, and the total ice of Antarctica is increasing... At this moment, the is hopelessly politicized. In the wake of [Carol Browner], it is probably better to shut it down and start over. What we need is a new organization much closer to the ... Because in the end, science offers us the only way out of politics. And if we allow science to become politicized, then we are lost.


 




Bill Seitz, fluxent at gmail dot com, Weblog