|
|
z2004-03-30- Seligman On Edge
|
|
Bill Seitz is a Product Manager/CTO with a track-record of bringing a business perspective to building agile product-development teams for start-ups, and is seeking a senior role in an entrepreneurial organization building disruptive Internet-driven products.
|
|
(backlinks off)
|
(map off)
|
(search off)
|
|
last edited
by BillSeitz
on
Nov 19, 2008 8:16 am |
Martin Seligman in EdgeOrg. Coming out this month as part of the [DSM] is a classification of strengths and VirTue-s; it's the opposite of the classification of the insanities. When we look we see that there are six VirTue-s, which we find endorsed across cultures, and these break down into 24 strengths. The six virtues that we find are non-arbitrary - first, a WisDom and Know Ledge cluster; second, a CourAge cluster; third, virtues like love and humanity; fourth, a [JustIce] cluster; fifth a temperance, moderation cluster; and sixth a [Spiritual Ity], transcendence cluster... So just to review so far, there is the [Pleasant Life] - having as many of the pleasures as you can and the skills to amplify them - and the [Good Life] - knowing what your signature strengths are and recrafting everything you do to use them a much as possible. But there's a third form of life, and if you're a bridge player like me, or a stamp collector, you can have eudaemonia; that is, you can be in Flow State. But everyone finds that as they grow older and look in the mirror they worry that they're fidgeting until they die. That's because there's a third form of happiness that is ineluctably pursued by humans, and that's the pursuit of MeanIng. I'm not going to be sophomoric enough to try to tell Edge viewers the theory of meaning, but there is one thing we know about meaning: that meaning consists in attachment to something bigger than you are. The self is not a very good site for meaning, and the larger the thing that you can credibly attach yourself to, the more meaning you get out of life... There will likely be a pharmacology of pleasure, and there may be a pharmacology of positive emotion generally, but it's unlikely there'll be an interesting pharmacology of flow. And it's impossible that there'll be a pharmacology of meaning.
Read the whole thing - excellent.
Bill Seitz, fluxent at gmail dot com, Weblog