WebSeitz/wikilog
z2004-03-30- Seligman On Edge
is a Product Manager/CTO with a track-record of bringing a business perspective to building agile product-development teams for start-ups, and is seeking a senior role in an entrepreneurial organization building disruptive Internet-driven products.

(backlinks off) (map off)
(search off)
last edited by BillSeitz on Nov 19, 2008 8:16 am

in . Coming out this month as part of the [DSM] is a classification of strengths and -s; it's the opposite of the classification of the insanities. When we look we see that there are six -s, which we find endorsed across cultures, and these break down into 24 strengths. The six virtues that we find are non-arbitrary - first, a and cluster; second, a cluster; third, virtues like love and humanity; fourth, a [JustIce] cluster; fifth a temperance, moderation cluster; and sixth a [Spiritual Ity], transcendence cluster... So just to review so far, there is the [Pleasant Life] - having as many of the pleasures as you can and the skills to amplify them - and the [Good Life] - knowing what your signature strengths are and recrafting everything you do to use them a much as possible. But there's a third form of life, and if you're a bridge player like me, or a stamp collector, you can have eudaemonia; that is, you can be in . But everyone finds that as they grow older and look in the mirror they worry that they're fidgeting until they die. That's because there's a third form of happiness that is ineluctably pursued by humans, and that's the pursuit of . I'm not going to be sophomoric enough to try to tell Edge viewers the theory of meaning, but there is one thing we know about meaning: that meaning consists in attachment to something bigger than you are. The self is not a very good site for meaning, and the larger the thing that you can credibly attach yourself to, the more meaning you get out of life... There will likely be a pharmacology of pleasure, and there may be a pharmacology of positive emotion generally, but it's unlikely there'll be an interesting pharmacology of flow. And it's impossible that there'll be a pharmacology of meaning.

Read the whole thing - excellent.


 




Bill Seitz, fluxent at gmail dot com, Weblog