|
|
z2004-04-22- Dehora Objects Vs Services
|
|
Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
|
|
(backlinks off)
|
(map off)
|
(search off)
|
|
last edited
by BillSeitz
on
Apr 19, 2008 6:51 am |
Bill De Hora on mentality conflicts. You see, when it comes to Distributed Computing, I think all object oriention (OOP) does is obscure matters. We end up talking about transactions, parameters, references, interfaces, when we should be talking about messages, state, names, protocols. And if that doesn't fit with object thinking, so much the worse for it - distribution and decentralization is becoming the norm.... I just wouldn't start with an object model and then figure out how to negotiate their consistent state once I'd flung them around the network. I'd look for an application protocol that fitted my needs. The closest I'd get to an object model is a generative or associative model (a la Java Spaces, or content based routers). But for that I don't need objects in the design - I need data tuples. (Tuple Space)
Bill Seitz, fluxent at gmail dot com, Weblog