WebSeitz/wikilog
z2004-11-12- Frankston Teaching Evolution
Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

(backlinks off) (map off)
(search off)
last edited by BillSeitz on Aug 12, 2008 4:08 pm

on teaching about . This is an endemic problem because we teach evolution in biology classes. Biology is too complex to teach hard sciences. So evolution comes across just as another stupid and wrong rhyme like "ontology recapitulates phylogeny"... Evolution is really an emergent property of any that can regenerate success and quench failure. It's easiest to think of these as digital systems though it's tautological. Scale and perturbation are part of the mix... I argue that evolution doesn't create complex systems. Each step is simple - we just don't recognize the simplicity. For those of us who architect systems we know how important the right decomposition is and there isn't just a single one... Without the notions of opportunity, decompositions and emergent properties we are stuck with arbitrary and seeming inexplicable (thus magical) complexity. Biology, as science, is a messy landscape in which those seeking to confirm there theories found plenty of ambiguity. This makes it difficult to isolate evolutionary processes and provides shelter to those who are seek confirmation of their beliefs rather new understanding.


 




Bill Seitz, fluxent at gmail dot com, Weblog