Matt Taibbi on Journal Ism and the end of searching for WMD-s. As for the second question, "how it could have happened", I have an answer. It is an answer that will not require the convening of a special symposium at the Columbia Journalism School, the commission of a new study by the Brookings Institution, or a poll by Poynter. The answer is this: You lied! It's really as simple as that. Everyone knew it was bullshit. I defy [Bill Keller] to stare me in the face and tell me he didn't know the whole War On Iraq business was a lie from the start. Whether or not there were actually [WMDs] in Iraq is a canard; this was essentially unknowable at the time. It was the rest of it that was obviously idiotic, yet even the pointiest heads in the business, like the folks at the Times, swallowed it with a smile... The error here was not a mistake of fact. The problem was that a central tenet of our system of news reporting dictates that lies of consensus will never be considered punishable mistakes.

User Options Recent Changes Help Page