WebSeitz/wikilog
z2006-12-24- Wiki Search Engine
It may look like a crisis, but it's only the end of an illusion.

(backlinks off) (map off)
(search off)
last edited by BillSeitz on Aug 20, 2008 7:56 pm

(via ) plans to build a to compete with . A key approach is to use to evaluate page-quality as an alternative to . will provide technical expertise in addition to the money they already put in.

, in repeating his objection to posting (vs commenting via your own ), notes that / mechanisms are being undermined by the . The rise of , like del.icio.us and ma.gnol.ia, and the new prominence of social navigation () tools like digg and reddit, partially compensates for our loss. But digg and reddit by definition reward mostly the rich; it's much easier for celebrities () to generate digg momentum than it is for kids or scholars. Would a for those tools help, or just create more momentum?

Oct'2007 update: the chatter continues. Wales said that if a search engine's source code was simply released to the public and a large number of volunteer users constantly monitored the results like with , then it would actually be a better defense against spammers. Plus, users at the grassroots level, instead of a company like Google, could then decide which links should come up first when a search is inputted and what the public should see and read first on any given topic. (that actually sounds a bit like )


 




Bill Seitz, fluxent at gmail dot com, Weblog