WebSeitz/wikilog
z2007-01-31- Second Life Shirky Others
Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

(backlinks off) (map off)
(search off)
last edited by BillSeitz on Aug 13, 2008 10:14 pm

goes beyond the direct issue of to question broader adoption. If, on the other hand, we don't start off by lumping with as -s, a very different question emerges: why do virtual game worlds () outperform non-game worlds in their adoption?... In this telling, games are not just special, they are special in a way that relieves designers of the pursuit of maximal realism... I believe this version of will in fact be achieved, someday. I do not, however, believe that it will involve a screen.

responds mainly to Shirky's earlier pieces on the numbers. My own sense is that Second Life has struck a deeper chord in our culture than those previous [MUD]-s and [MOO]-s did - in part because of the by other powerful institutions in our culture. To some degree, all of the corporate, academic, nonprofit, and foundation interest in [SL] is part of the hype which Shirky is dismissing here. There has certainly been a snow ball effect where this group has to be in [SL] because that group is in second life and so forth. But there is also a way in which [SL] embodies a new mixed media ecology in which institutions with very different levels of power, wealth, and influence co-exist in a shared virtual space creating more equivalence in terms of their relationship to the media landscape. This is the heart of what Benkler writes about in The and there is perhaps no more powerful illustration of this new hybrid media ecology than [SL].... Some have dismissed [SL] as a costume party - I see it more as carnival in the medieval sense of the term - as a time and place within which normal rules of interactions are suspended, roles can be swapped or transformed, hierarchies can be reordered, and we can step out of normal reality into a "magic circle" or "green world" which can be highly generative for the imagination... I care only a little bit about the future of -s. I care a great deal about the future of . And for the moment, the debate about and the hype surrounding [SL] is keeping alive the idea that we might design and inhabit our own worlds and construct our own . That's something worth defending.


 




Bill Seitz, fluxent at gmail dot com, Weblog