WebSeitz/wikilog
z2007-03-20- Buying Iraq Exit Votes Via Pork Barrel
is a Product Manager/CTO with a track-record of bringing a business perspective to building agile product-development teams for start-ups, and is seeking a senior role in an entrepreneurial organization building disruptive Internet-driven products.

(backlinks off) (map off)
(search off)
last edited by BillSeitz on Oct 24, 2008 7:01 pm

The is using $21B of funding to buy support for setting an exit-deadline on the . Uh, whose money is that?

More details. The $100 million for the political party conventions - $50 million for the Democratic convention in Denver and $50 million for the Republican convention in St. Paul, Minn. - is included in a section described as "Katrina recovery, veterans' care and for other purposes."

comments - Once again Congress wants to have it both ways. Back in 2002, Congress passed the authorization for the president to attack if and when he saw fit. By ignoring the Constitution, which clearly requires a declaration of war, Congress could wash its hands of responsibility after the war began going badly by citing the ambiguity of its authorization. This time, House leaders want to appear to be opposing the war by including problematic benchmarks, but they include language to allow the president to waive these if he sees fit. To top it off, House leadership may have actually made war with more likely. The bill originally contained language making it clear that the president would need congressional authorization before attacking Iran - as the Constitution requires. But this language was dropped after special interests demanded its removal. This move can reasonably be interpreted as de facto congressional authority for an attack on Iran. Let's hope that does not happen.


 




Bill Seitz, fluxent at gmail dot com, Weblog