WebSeitz/wikilog
z2007-04-24- Nation Building Vs Phases Of Order
is a Product Manager/CTO with a track-record of bringing a business perspective to building agile product-development teams for start-ups, and is seeking a senior role in an entrepreneurial organization building disruptive Internet-driven products.

(backlinks off) (map off)
(search off)
last edited by BillSeitz on Nov 30, 2008 10:58 pm

examines the work of [Douglass C North], [John Joseph Wallis], and [Barry R Weingast] and its implications for and the . [NWW] claim that there are three types of societies. Primitive orders are small bands of hunter-gatherers (), and they are of little concern here. [Limited Access] orders are societies that provide meaningful political and economic rights only to narrow elites. [Open Access] orders are capitalist democracies () that give political and economic rights to most citizens. [NWW] argue that limited-access orders are the "natural state:" they are stable, they resist economic progress, and they only rarely make the transition to open-access orders...For [NWW], these three types of order are like the three chemical phases of solid, liquid, and gas. That is, they are clearly distinct from one another, and transitions between different forms of order ([Phase Change]) take place only under special conditions... [NWW] argue that three conditions are necessary before a transition from a limited-access order to an open-access order is even conceivable... Accordingly, I would say that there is no chance that the United States will succeed in its objective of establishing an open-access order in Iraq. The best we can hope to do is restore Iraq to a natural state, meaning a limited-access order where rights and power are exclusive to certain elites, who will be subject neither to economic nor political competition as we know it. Ugh, that kind of cynical [Real Politik] seems to have often led to nasty for us...


 




Bill Seitz, fluxent at gmail dot com, Weblog