(2023-11-01) Sloan Moonbound
Robin Sloan: on Moonbound! The title of my new novel, coming in June 2024 from MCD×FSG, is: Moonbound: The Last Book of the Anth
I’ve just created a mini-site that will collect everything I write about the project.
Leading the way, you’ll find the first clues about the novel’s content. Also noteworthy: I intend this book as the first in a trilogy. Here’s why.
this period, October through December, is the season of mass: bulky bins of olives choreographed into the crusher.
California’s San Joaquin Valley is best understood as a giant, open-air factory floor. I don’t mean that in any pejorative sense; rather, the opposite: this might be the world’s biggest, most productive factory. My point is simply that it’s totally engineered, densely woven with infrastucture. It’s amazing, in this season, to see the trucks constantly rolling, pulling gondola trailers brimming over with tomatoes or almonds, bound for humongous processing facilities. Nothing is independent here: every one of these operations relies on a thick web of capital (machines) and capability (people who can fix the machines).
My work with Fat Gold has been a terrific education in all the technologies that make this place possible.
The wheel gets a lot of credit — and sure, wheels are handy — but more and more, I think the key to human civilization is probably: the pump.
Premonition of a Dragon Moon
A companion website work-in-progress. My new novel, titled Moonbound, will be published next year. You have therefore arrived a bit early. Not to worry — I’m here, too, and I’ll be adding material steadily between now and June 2024.
Notes toward a pitch
In June, a crisp, appealing pitch will not be optional
Here is what’s in my head now, floppy but accurate:
In this novel, I describe two futures. First, a near future of humanity, in which we solve many of our largest problems, and become the civilization we are capable of becoming. Second, a distant future, in which things have gone awry for Earth
Here’s another attempt, a bit shorter: The year is 13777. There are dragons on the moon.
Moonbound is the kind of book I have always wanted to write. It is totally engaging for adults — the tone, style, and vocabulary are unchanged from my previous novels — but/and I believe it’s also accessible to young readers, from perhaps 12 on up.
Here is Moonbound described by my editors at MCD×FSG, characteristically punchy and electric:
It is thirteen thousand years from now … A lot has happened, and yet a lot is still very familiar. Ariel is a boy in a small town under a wizard’s rule. Like many adventurers before him, Ariel is called to explore a world full of unimaginable glories and challenges: unknown enemies, a mission to save the world, a girl. Here, as they say, be dragons. But none of this happens before Ariel comes across an artifact from an earlier civilization, a sentient, record-keeping artificial intelligence that carries with it the perspective of the whole of human history — and becomes both Ariel’s greatest ally and the narrator of our story.
The evidence mounts: you’re better off letting other people describe your books. Maybe so, but I still need something to SAY! I need to sell this thing to a potential reader in like … two sentences.
Theories about series
My vision isn’t just for a book, but a trilogy
Moonbound begins in a village; the trilogy’s destination is the cosmos, with meaningful stops at every zoom level in between.
the series is a genre unto itself, and its genre properties are mainly temporal. The series is a work-in-time: THAT is what makes it fun
You might object, correctly, that you can read and enjoy a series many years after it’s been completed. That’s true, but remember: the series would not have succeeded — would not have circulated sufficiently to find its way, eventually, to you — without that initial flux of realtime energy
Of course, we also have to consider the series that linger … and stretch … and slow … and stop. These are the great cautionary tales. Returning to my premise above, I think these series are so disappointing — so deflating — precisely because the writer has betrayed that electric sense of “in it together”. The writer is, in fact, hardly “in it” at all. What a bummer.
Edited: | Tweet this! | Search Twitter for discussion