Smashed Together Words

Robert Levy's Dirty Dozen 1595230505 covers 12 Supreme Court cases that the authors see as most undermining the Us Constitution.

  • interfere in your private contractual agreements (Home Building & Loan Assn. v. Blaisdell - 1934) Majority: Hughes; Joined by: Brandeis, Cardozo, Roberts, Stone. Dissent: Sutherland, Joined by: Butler, Mc Reynolds, Van Devanter

  • Helvering v. Davis (1937) allowed the government to tax and spend for the "general welfare," thereby opening the floodgates through which the redistributive state was ready to pour - taking money from some, giving it to others, without any meaningful constitutional constraints (NewDeal) Majority: Cardozo, Joined by: Sutherland, Hughes, Roberts, Stone, Van Devanter; Dissenting: Butler, Joined by: Mc Reynolds.

  • curtailed gun owners' rights (United States v. Miller - 1939) - Majority:McReynolds; Joined by: Hughes, Butler, Stone, Roberts, Black, Reed, Frankfurter (no dissent).

  • Wickard v. Filburn (1942) let Congress use the Inter State commerce clause to restrict activities that are neither interstate nor commerce, thus extending federal regulatory authority to nearly every productive activity and eviscerating the principle that federal powers are limited to those enumerated in the Constitution (contra States Rights) Majority: Jackson; Joined by: Stone, Roberts, Black, Reed, Frankfurter, Douglas, Murphy, Byrnes (no dissent)

  • enabled government to arrest and imprison you indefinitely, without filing charges (Korematsu v. United States - 1942) Majority: Black; Joined by: Stone, Reed, Douglas, Rutledge, Frankfurter, Dissent by: Roberts, Murphy, Jackson. (Japanese Intern Ment)

  • permitted government "taking" of private property through unlimited cost-inducing regulation (Penn Central Tranport v. New York - 1978)

  • empowered government to seize your private property, without compensation, when someone uses the property for criminal activity - even if you don't know about it (Bennis v. Michigan - 1996)

  • opened the door to lawmaking by administrative agencies (Whitman v. American Trucking - 2001)

  • curtail your right to criticize or support political candidates (Mc Connell vs. Federal Election Commission - 2003)

  • permitted racial discrimination by state entities for the "right" reasons (Grutter v. Bollinger - 2003)

  • KeLo v. City of New London (2005) declared that the government can seize private property and transfer it to another private owner, providing one more deplorable example of eroding property rights - permitting local planners to run roughshod over isolated and vulnerable members of society

Maybe we should add Smith v. Maryland (1979) when the Supreme Court decided that phone records (MetaData) didn't deserve any PrivAcy protection.

z2008-05-27- Dirty Dozen Supreme Rulings
User Stories
Chorus Of Voices
Press Release
Author Publisher Entrepreneur

Werner Vogels on AmaZon's "Working Backwards" process of Product Development. The product definition process works backwards in the following way: we start by writing the documents we'll need at launch (the Press Release and the FAQ) and then work towards documents that are closer to the implementation.

z2006-11-15- Vogels Amazon Working Backwards Product Development
Tom Munnecke

My Intro Blurb:

This is the publicly-readable WikiLog Thinking Space of Bill Seitz (a Product Manager and CTO) (also a Wiki Junkie).

My Calling: to accelerate Evolut Ion by increasing FreeDom and Opportunity and AgenCy for many people via DAndD of Thinking Tools (software and Games To Play) that increase the LeverAge of Free Agent-s and smaller groups (Small World).

See Intro Page for space-related goals, status, etc.; or WikiNode for more terse summary info.

Beware the War On The Net!




Seeking: Product Manager-type position in established organization with entrepreneurial culture, local to Barrington Il or remote. My value: accelerating business-changing product development.



My Recent Key Pages:
My Blog Roll:
Follow me on Twitter

My Tip Jar