WebSeitz/wikilog
Global User Id
Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

(backlinks off) (map off)
(search off)
last edited by BillSeitz on Aug 26, 2008 1:17 am

Having a single unique personal identifier to remember, which is the key to online profiles everywhere. (see also )

Is anyone concerned about how much easier a [GUID] environment makes it for value to be created by aggregating data about you individually from the multiple sites you visit? Do you want your insurance broker site to be able to find out that you've been reading a lot of articles about ?

I realize (a) that to some extent this is already possible, and (b) it seem like more of a legal issue than a technical issue.

But (a) it makes things a lot easier/reliable for aggregators, and (b) do you want to trust the legal system?

Any membership-reference-server is of course a weak link (because the various registration requests go to there), but that's a single relationship that the user might invest greater trust into. But when there's [GUID] added as a feature, then any 2 sites can sell their detailed behavior data to 3rd parties.

Note sure what the answer is here, not even sure how big the problem is, but it's worth thought.

One solution to this would be to (a) have varying ids/pws at the member sites, (b) have all that data centralized at the user's reference server, and use that server to sign into individual member sites (e.g. the reference server generates a form which the user clicks on to do a post to a member-site sign-in function).

But that's rather clunky (given that you might be following a link into a particular member site where you're already a member, you don't want to have to back out to your reference site, sign into the member site, then find that [URL] you really wanted). Though, on the other hand, you could simplify that process a bit, where

See : | |


 




Bill Seitz, fluxent at gmail dot com, Weblog