Net Neutrality
Discussion about whether Broad Band providers can/should provide different Quality Of Service/Qo S to different types of applications (data transfer vs VoIP/Video, etc.)
-
the concern of many is that this is just an excuse to add more forms of tolls
-
is this the same as Common Carrier rules?
How does this relate to the Stupid Network/OpenNet concept?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_neutrality
http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/307
http://www.savetheinternet.com/
http://pulver.com/savethenet/index.html
May25'2006 article
Robert X Cringley sees the carrier's lobbying as targeted mainly at VoIP.
Tom Evslin thinks we're better off enforcing Anti-Trust regulations to increase competition.
- he [also](http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Fractals Of Change/~3/9778091/reader_comment__1.html) notes his own experience on supporting VoIP over the Stupid Network (and makes other responses to a TelCo commenter).
Edited: | Tweet this! | Search Twitter for discussion
BackLinks: 2006-07-20-CringleyFrankstonNetNeutralityHomeBroadband | 2007-07-16-IsenbergSustainableNetNeutrality | 2007-08-15-LessigAttBlockPearlJam | 2007-10-24-ComcastBlockingPeerTraffic | 2008-06-11-NyIspUsenetPornBlock | 2010-08-05-GoogleVerizonNonNeutralityDeal | 2010-08-05-IsenbergFccSecretNetNeutralityTalks | 2014-01-15-NetNeutralityStruckDown | 2017-08-21-WhyYourFavoriteSitesAreSuddenlyAskingForMoney | CommonCarrier | DWeb | OneWebDay | OpenSociety | PirateWheel | TimWu
No twinpages!