Here's how I understand Pass Port.

• End Users store their personal profile data in one of the Reference Sites, probably that of Micro Soft. (I think of this as the first/primary data stored in Hail Storm.)

• Member Sites who desire data from End Users (for free registration on ad-supported sites, for shipping data on e-commerce sites) can request data about a user from one of the Reference Sites. User avoids having to fill out form. When End Users return, they don't have to remember their [ID]/password on that site, Pass Port passes that data along for them. In some/all of these cases the Member Sites pay money to Micro Soft. End Users will probably not have to pay for this feature.

How will this work? What will the Member Sites have to do to their pages, code, or data structures to plug into Pass Port? What if the protocol changes later?

The potential [MS] move I just thought of would be to eliminate the field-value-remember feature of [IE], tying it into Pass Port ("for greater user security", or something like that).

Of course, this same kind of thinking leads me to believe that almost everyone will end up with a Pass Port account, other than a few number of people who go out of their way to avoid it (like Dave Mc Cusker has posted ). This will be maybe even smaller than the number of people who install ad-blocking or cookie-blocking plugins. (I suspect that this basic [SSO] functionality will remain free to the user. The user will end up paying if they want to store additional data in Hailstorm. And sites will have to pay to have access to Passport data for [SSO].)

In which case, what scenario/action, other than government intervention, supports the belief that an alternate solution will get past the chicken/egg problem to reach critical mass of acceptance by users and sites?

If that's not the goal, and we're just trying to create an alternative for 5% of the online population, then we should be clear about that.

(Because if my options as a site developer are:

1. support Passport and pay, with 95% of users included

2. support alternative system, no pay but 10% of users

3. support both

4. support neither

I suspect I'll go with #1 if my margin per registration is sufficiently high, #4 otherwise.)

User Options Recent Changes Help Page