WebSeitz/wikilog
Social Security
Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

(backlinks off) (map off)
(search off)
last edited by BillSeitz on Aug 16, 2008 11:16 am

Welfare for old people who already have money. :)

A kind of /? Bah, mostly just a /[Transfer Program].

considers some possibilities. (2003)

A big factor is the used to calculate when benefits are given out. Does it make sense that it's still 65 (going up to 67 in 2012 I think)?

Why is there no ?

Benefits grow based on wages, and should instead probably be pegged to general [CPI] [Inflat Ion].

Why do you need a [Social Security Number], if the money you get back really has nothing to do with how much you put in? When I took civics/[Social Studies] in school, a teacher said that someone suggested eliminating the numbers to , on the basis that managing them just created pointless expense. And he replied that it was important for the american people to feel like they were putting money into their own account, like an enforced savings plan.

See : | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |


 



Bill Seitz, fluxent at gmail dot com, Weblog