WebSeitz/wikilog
Argumentat Ion
Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

(backlinks off) (map off)
(search off)
last edited by BillSeitz on Jul 4, 2008 12:10 pm

An argument is an attempt to provide a compelling, rigorous demonstration of the truth of a conclusion, based on the truth of any number of premises. If the argument is valid, the premises together entail or imply the conclusion... The difference between an argument and an explanation should be clear. On the one hand, the function or purpose of an argument is to convince people who might be doubting the conclusion. On the other hand, the function or purpose of an explanation is to give the cause of some phenomenon which we observe, or are willing to assume actually occurs. To put it even more briefly, the purpose of an argument is to persuade, while the purpose of an explanation is to explain. http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument

[DeBate] is a formalized system of logical . A debate is a rule-governed contest presided by an official, consisting of two or more sides where each side is attempting to win the approval of a designated audience, such as a judge or jury. http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debate

The term dialogue expresses basically reciprocal conversation between two or more persons... Plato further simplified the form, and reduced it to pure argumentative conversation, while leaving intact the amusing element of character-drawing. http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialogue

In his later years, developed the technique of , in which equal status and "free space" were the most important prerequisites. He believed that if carried out on a sufficiently wide scale, these Dialogues could help overcome fragmentation in society. http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Bohm

see also

journal http://www.kluweronline.com/issn/0920-427X/contents reasoning, natural inference and persuasion: communication, rhetoric (classical and modern), linguistics, discourse analysis, pragmatics, psychology, philosophy, logic (formal and informal), critical thinking, history and law. Its scope includes a diversity of interests, varying from philosophical, theoretical and analytical to empirical and practical topics.

and tutorial http://sorrel.humboldt.edu/~act/

[Tom Formaro]: This work examines how in alters author, reader, and text. http://users.rcn.com/mackey/thesis/thesis.html

See : | | | | | | |


 




Bill Seitz, fluxent at gmail dot com, Weblog