WebSeitz/wikilog
Pragmat Ism
It may look like a crisis, but it's only the end of an illusion.

(backlinks off) (map off)
(search off)
last edited by BillSeitz on Oct 5, 2008 11:15 pm

In other words, the criterion of truth is reduced absolutely to the immediate validity of the application... [Percy Bridgman]'s elaboration of , the development of Pragmatism which says that a concept is not meaningful unless it can be reduced to a sequence of human actions. http://www.marxists.org/glossary/terms/p/r.htm#pragmatism

http://www.pragmatism.org

involvement The pragmatists were caught between two different philosophical movements and were equally critical of both. On the one hand, they were reacting against nineteenth century idealist philosophy, which often got hung up in metaphysical disputes that had no possibility of being resolved. But on the other hand, they were equally critical of the positivist's belief that it was possible to not do metaphysics.

's Version of Pragmatism which he called "[Instrumental Ism]" needs to be distinguished from the pragmatism of and [William James], as well as the [Instrumental Ism] of the [Logical Positiv Ist]-s. From Hegel Dewey inherited the idea of thought as both the mediation of "raw" sensation through categories and concepts, and the idea that such mediation does not signal a movement away from reality, but towards a more adequate grasp of it.

British [Empiric Ism] - see section "Types of Empiricism"

Critical Pragmatism: A Rough Draft http://asterix.ednet.lsu.edu/~maxcy/cp.html Extending from the 19th Century work of [Charles S Pierce], through the writings of [William James], ,and [George Herbert Mead], to contemporary thinkers like [Richard Rorty], [Richard Bernstein], and [Cornel West]... What is involved is a "practical intersubjectivity" wherein the only significant criterion for identity in meaning is in the agreement in action, as Biestra (1994) tells us. This is to say that what we mean by collaboration, joint tenantcy, or partnership is what the outcome may mean in social action: "...understanding is basically a practical matter..." (, )

History of http://home.mira.net/~andy/works/history.htm It is during this period that Pragmatism appears, via the American logician and later the mystic [William James]. Pragmatism comes on to the scene as a tendency towards [Irrational Ism]: "What difference would it practically make to any one if this notion rather than that notion were true? If no practical difference whatever can be traced, then the alternatives mean practically the same thing, and all dispute is idle." (William James, What Pragmatism Means, 1906) Now there is, in this rejection of the concept of theoretical truth, the insistence upon practice as the critierion of truth which is undoubtedly progressive and rational, but this emerges only later, in the of [Percy Bridgman]. In a sense pragmatism shares the conception of practice as the criterion of truth with Hegel: for Hegel, practice is only the criterion of truth, for pragmatism, practice is the only criterion of truth.

http://cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/notebooks/pragmatism.html

[William James]' is a free

This all seems related to the -based approach of ...

See : | | | | | | | | | | | | |


 




Bill Seitz, fluxent at gmail dot com, Weblog