| WebSeitz/wikilog |
| Small World |
|
| last edited by BillSeitz on Sep 26, 2008 7:37 pm |
My current Society Design game/model: Route Around Big World
see Scale Vs Consolidation, Small Is Beautiful, The Craft
basic idea
Big institutions carry inherent risks - specifically that individual humans (customers, employees, shareholders, citizens, etc.) get treated as mass commodities. This seems to occur regardless of the official mission of the organization.
there have certainly been Old Economy/20C benefits to bigness - cheap goods, successful Big Projects.
but
things seem out of balance - does everything require a Big solution?
bigness should be less necessary/optimal in a New Economy/21C
It seems unlikely to be possible to keep a Big organization human over time. So a change-them strategy (from within or without) seems unrealistic.
And maybe we don't want to change them. When elephants dance, mice watch out.
So what "we" "really" "want" is the space to stay human in our (TelIc) relationships.
This seems to involve finding ecological niches and ways to keep them human. TAZ, Making A Living, etc.
misc notes
some other models/filters/glosses: OrganIc/[Mechanist Ic], [YinYang], Network/Hierarchal, Complex/Linear, Certain/Uncertain...
hmm, this maybe isn't an end unto itself, but a means to an end - Divers Ity, FreeDom, Open Society...
to clarify a bit, the goal isn't to go "back to small", but "through big to small"
it's pro [Design Science], [Raised Expectations], Economics Of Abundance, etc. - assuming that's workable.
Yah, I'm aware this is well-trodden territory. I may fail in resolving the paradox, or may end up sounding like Bucky Fuller (or Aleister Crowley).
a thought re implementation approach - change the system
identify a [BigX] (not specific institution so much as structure)
come up with alternative scenario
define "requirements" or Boot Strapping steps to achieve it
publicize need for those steps to happen
make one of them happen...
learning from FourGw?
another approach - Route Around the system with a focus on increasing Resil Ience
Also a book [Small Worlds]: The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness by Duncan Watts ISBN:0691005419
Also the more-official name of Stanley Milgram's Six Degrees Of Separation study.
A group at Columbia is now (2002) trying to replicate the study.
| User Options Recent Changes Help Page |