WebSeitz/wikilog
PoverTy
Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

(backlinks off) (map off)
(search off)
last edited by BillSeitz on Aug 29, 2008 5:05 pm

Hmm, what defines poverty? person in in the same condition in the vs the ?

[National Review] ([Robert Rector]) in 1999: These facts are gleaned from the government's own surveys of the living conditions of the poor... Forty-one percent of the poor actually own their own homes, typically a three-bedroom house with one-and-one-half baths... About 70 percent of poor households own a car or truck, and more than a quarter own two or more cars. Two-thirds of the poor have air conditioning, and a similar number have microwaves. Nearly half of all poor households own two or more color television sets. Almost three-quarters of the poor now have [VCRs].

[David Henderson] in - The third reason the line between those getting richer and poorer becomes blurred is the incredible that the United States enjoys. Today, people in the lowest-fifth income bracket are likely to be in a higher one in a few years. Imagine you could take a picture of everyone in the lowest quintile; nine years later, you take another picture of that quintile. How many people would be in both? Surprisingly few.

studied by (limited to the ?)

one apparent factor in the is ()

The official poverty measure is of little help to policymakers and researchers who seek to understand poverty, to track policy effects on poverty, and to develop policies to alleviate it, argues [Robert T Michael], a faculty affiliate with the Joint Center for Poverty Research and Dean of the Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies at the University of Chicago.

[Gregg Easterbrook] on [One Nation Underprivileged] (ISBN:0195101685 ) by [Mark Robert Rank]. Also, this profile says that 58 percent of Americans will experience at least one year of poverty between the ages of 20 and 75. In addition, two-thirds of adults will receive a welfare program, such as Food Stamps or Supplemental Security Income, by the time they reach age 65. They also found that most people encountering poverty or the use of welfare do so over fairly short intervals: typically, one or two years. Hmm, does this support the theory, and raise the issue of whether programs really make the difference vs just the passage of time? According to Rank's research, only 1 out of 4 welfare recipients had parents who also used welfare. Hmm, doesn't that contradict the previous point about 58% ending up on welfare for at least a while?

PhilJones:MTVAndCycleOfPoverty

See : | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |


 




Bill Seitz, fluxent at gmail dot com, Weblog